clarentine: (Default)
[personal profile] clarentine
A New York Magazine article (http://nymag.com/news/features/46011/, linked to recently on a friend's blog) included the following passage: "For women in clubby, male-dominated industries, like banking and consulting, the objective is often to appear more masculine (and ward off the suspicion that you will someday procreate and thus become professionally unviable). “They cultivate a hard edge, pressing to be more masculine in their manner and the way they deal with people,” the management consultant told me."

Am I alone in objecting to the either-or nature of this behavioral equation? I fear it may be pure idealism on my part to wish we ("we") would stop defining behavior in such a polarizing manner. I would like very much for people to stop saying, in effect, "Assertiveness is a male characteristic" and change that statement around to "Male behavior often includes assertiveness." It is inappropriate shorthand, in my opinion, to say "masculine" when you mean certain behaviors often, but not exclusively, associated with males.

Perhaps this is why so much of my fiction revolves around gender issues. (You think?)

Anyway, I had to get that thought off my chest. I doubt the issue will ever be settled--certainly not in my generation--since it is human nature not to pursue or accept change unless the status quo is actively painful, but it doesn't hurt to discuss the topic from time to time. Or even hit them over the head with it occasionally, eh?

Profile

clarentine: (Default)
clarentine

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 4th, 2026 09:51 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios